She and her husband together create a conflict of interest, Judge Dana Sabraw has a paper trail to the federal bench. Refine Your Search Results All Filters. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the web designer. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants DA Stephan, ADA Patrick, City Attorney Elliot, and former Deputy City Attorney Scott are barred by the doctrine of prosecutorial immunity. Check reviews, hours, insurance options, & book your appointment today. Accordingly, Counts I and V are dismissed with prejudice. at 7-8, 14-16. California., Editors Note See Prior Action Dkt. First, Plaintiff may not sue the SDPD under 1983 absent allegations of a policy or custom because the SDPD is a municipality, not a "person" as required by the statute. 118 at 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. at 15. Id. Call for connection for LA CalBar Court. Judicial immunity "applies `however erroneous the act may have been, and however injurious in its consequences it may have proved to plaintiff." These are some of the names: World Automotive Financial Services,inc and Lavi International Corporation,. Maggie Fink Sussman. A former computer crimes prosecutor who worked for the Justice Department for 12 years, Mr. Sussmann in 2016 represented the Democratic National Committee on Plaintiff does not identify the statements that ADA Patrick made to the press. If you are thinking of hiring Sussman & Katz, Inc, we recommend double-checking their license status with the license board and using our bidding system to get competitive quotes. State judges are further insulated from suit by the Eleventh Amendment. P. He resides in Amherst, Massachusetts with his wife, Lynn. Utilities Comm'n,67 F.3d 1470, 1477 (9th Cir. Plaintiff also failed to follow the procedure set forth in Rule 62.1. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff alleges violations of unspecified rights under 1983 and RICO against the Prosecutorial Defendants (Counts I and V); conspiracy to obstruct justice and interference with a federal lawsuit against DA Stephan and ADA Patrick (Count VII-VIII); abuse of process against DA Stephan, ADA Patrick, and City Attorney Elliot (Count II); and defamation and interference with prospective economic advantage against former Deputy City Attorney Scott (Counts XIII-XIV). Rule 12(b)(6) is read in conjunction with Rule 8(a), which requires only "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." 73, 76, 78, 80-81, 83-86, 89-90]. Mar. During Plaintiff's second arrest on October 28, 2019, the SDPD allegedly used "brutal force" and "used unlawful search and seizure to obtain warrant on Sussman." And if that was not enough, 5 years later he paid him more money in exchange to be appointed a Superior Court Judge. Id. Buried Here. Michael's law moves for the indictment of all involved and the immediate removal from the office of Judge So with a full investigation into both matters, the Rief and Sussman covert murders. Zmurkewicz, US District Court for the Southern District of California. WebSussman et al v. San Diego Police Dept. Doe v. Lawrence Livermore Nat. at 18. Source: PACER. Plaintiff: Nancy Sussman and Michael Sussman. at 19. First, Plaintiff's claims against the Judicial Defendants are absolutely barred by judicial immunity, and thus Plaintiff cannot cure her claims as to them. California, 03-30-2022. Gould v. Mutual Life Ins. 330 WEST BROADWAY When they were timely. Moreover, her claim against the DMV does not seek prospective injunctive relief. Dana M. Sabraw United States District Judge. Michael Sussman. at 14-15. WebLisa Ann Sussman (Reigstration# 124989) is an attorney registered with State Bar of California. This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. Unrelated to those claims concerning her son, Plaintiff also alleges that Defendant Alfonso Martinez submitted a false police report in 2019 that Plaintiff threatened him. Bd.,235 F.3d 553, 557 (10th Cir. 102 persons linked to this address. Id. at 15. On November 14, 2019, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a timely Notice of Appeal of the Court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss. "The factors relevant in determining whether an act is judicial relate to the nature of the act itself, i.e., whether it is a function normally performed by a judge, and to the expectations of the parties, i.e., whether they dealt with the judge in his judicial capacity." Rather it must "examine whether conclusory allegations follow from the description of facts as alleged by the plaintiff." 1994 - 2018. Because all the Judicial Defendants' acts are judicial in nature, Plaintiffs claims against the Judicial Defendants are barred by both judicial immunity and Eleventh Amendment immunity.5. A paper trail right to the Federal Bench. Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case. WebMr. These events are wholly unrelated to the facts underlying the RICO claim, and thus, even reading Plaintiff's SAC liberally, there is no common nucleus of operative facts permitting supplemental jurisdiction. Select the best result to find their address, phone number, relatives, and public records. THEY VIOLATE EMTALA My novel, INCOGNOLIO, was accepted for the Kindle Scout contest and Im To state a claim for a RICO violation, a plaintiff must allege: "(1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity." Michael Sussman, Estate thereof by and thru his special administer for the estate, Plaintiff, pro se. Michael Sussman was only 24 years old, Jonah Rief was only 4 years old when put into intentional sex trafficking by Judge So. at 12-16. Nov. 5, 2013) (noting that outside of the Monell exception, "sub-departments or bureaus of municipalities, such as the police departments, are not generally considered `persons' within the meaning of 1983."). An "enterprise" includes "any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity." For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff also failed to follow the procedure set forth in Rule 62.1. Judge So put Michael in jail with drug sellers and criminals. The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Powered by, The Committee to Expose Dishonest and Incompetent Judges, Attorneys and Public Officials, Attorney Nancy Sussman of San Diego; ethical gremlin. 1367(c). Psychology (0) Oakland, CA . Co.,790 F.2d 769, 772 (9th Cir. In the Prior Action, the purported conspirators included Judge Kenneth So, the San Diego Police Department (the "SDPD"), the San Diego City Attorney's Office (the "City Attorney's Office"), City Attorney Mara Elliot, former Deputy City Attorney Ryan Scott, Lieutenant Jeff Jordon, and Alfonso Martinez, among other defendants. 2004). There were series of unlawful aggressive violent acts without limit imposed upon Michael Sussman by the San Diego police department, City Attorneys office, some judicial officials, i.e. This was to save money for Mercy Hospital and because a corrupt Judge ALLOWED IT. Although Plaintiff appears to claim that CHP Officer Parra's report resulted in the DMV's suspension of her license in 2020, Plaintiff's claim against CHP Officer Parra is otherwise unrelated to her remaining claims. 86-1 at 16. 2018) (finding insufficient service where plaintiff did not argue prior attempts were made and there was no evidence in the record of same); Avalos v. MMDEOL Inc., 2021 WL 540380, at *4 (E.D. Mark Sussman. "Racketeering activity" is any act indictable under the several provisions of Title 18 of the United States Code. Unravel the mystery of Incognolio or go mad! 70 (the "SAC"). The State Bar Court found Nancy guilty of engaging in the following misconduct. Each of these acts involves Defendants DA Stephan, ADA Patrick, Elliot, and Scott initiating prosecutions and presenting the state's case in court. Plaintiff does not further elaborate on the SDPD Defendants' role in any conspiracy. al., Defendants. 37-2016-00045136-CU-HRCTL; SAC at 6, 9, 16-17. Michael was a kind, smart person who would give anyone the shirt off his back. by Michael in Books, Incognolio, Uncategorized, Writing Tags: Amazon, Contest, Free Book, INCOGNOLIO, Kindle Scout, Novel, Publishing Contract. 2010) ("[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrinejudicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comitywill point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.") Michael was a great kid and both families have been completely destroyed by the psychopath court system and the San Diego police department. WebView Michael Sussman results in California (CA) including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. See Alfonso Martinez v. Nancy Sussman, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Case No. Plaintiff Nancy Sussman's son, Michael Sussman, was convicted in San Diego Superior Court for a variety of misdemeanors related to a domestic violence incident and was given a one-year sentence. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff brings an unspecified claim against the CBRN, which the Court liberally construes as a claim brought under 1983 (Count XIII).3. They may think they have won the battle, but we are here to fight the war. Id. Dr. Joshua Michael Sussman, PhD . The admitted year is 1986-12-11. Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. The tragedy of Jonah Rief will be discussed, testified to, including the involvement of Kamala Harris. A dismissal with prejudice constitutes a "final judgment on the merits" for res judicata purposes. Young Investigator. 1983cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights 4." Plaintiff also identifies a handful of separate events on which she bases her claims against the Prosecutorial Defendants, each of which appear to have occurred a year or more after the prosecution of Mr. Sussman. at 9, 28-29. Prosecutorial immunity shields prosecutors from civil damages suits premised upon acts committed within the scope of their official duties which are "intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process." Id. Thus, the third element of res judicata is clearly met as to Counts I and V against these Defendants. al., defendants. Dana M. Sabraw United States District In determining whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, the Court examines whether the federal and state law claims "derive from a common nucleus of operative fact[s] such that [a plaintiff] would ordinarily be expected to try them all in one judicial proceeding." Heres how it happened: Jon was never homicidal nor suicidal and was not a candidate for a demented ward to be locked up, where he lived miserably LOCKED UP AND MISTREATEATED AT VISTA KNOLL. A prosecutor is immune even when the prosecutor's malicious or dishonest action deprived defendant of his or her liberty. WebJudge Kenneth K So caused a 24 Year old man, Michael Sussman, along with the City Attorneys office and Michael Sussmans own attorney, Michael McCABE, to be Criminal etc, in essence defaming Sussman," which caused Plaintiff to lose her nursing license. Cahill v. Liberty Mut. WebMr Michael Preedy. Michael and his mother were set up by the SDPD. Michael was charged with 18 bogus stacked on misdemeanors. WE NEED BRITNEY TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST CORRUPT GOVERNMENTAL CONSERVATORSHIP. See Prior Action Dkt. Conf. 2,500 likes. Id. WebThe residential address for Gary is 5230 Fiore Terr, San Diego, CA 92122. ADA Patrick likewise allegedly initiated criminal proceedings for an improper purpose, and misrepresented facts to the court. WebSamuel George Sussman View details Phone Numbers (760) nay - peek View phones View Details AGE 50s Brian Michael Sussman San Diego, CA (Point Loma Peninsula) Aliases Brian M Sossman Phone Number Address Background Report Addresses Famosa Blvd Apt B, San Diego, CA Famosa Blvd, San Diego, CA Rue Dorleans, San Diego, CA Plus Distinguished Investigator. 2003). WebAttorney Nancy Sussman of San Diego; ethical gremlin The state of California presented Nancy Sussman with a law license in 1983 after she graduated from the University of Southern California (USC) School of Law. This procedure is set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1, which provides: Here, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal before she moved for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b). NANCY SUSSMAN, MICHAEL SUSSMAN ESTATE THEREOF BY AND THRU HIS SPECIAL ADMINISTER FOR THE ESTATE, Plaintiff, Scripps Mercy Hospital a Catholic hospital for profit in san Diego though he came in too much with a low pay insurance so they decided to get rid of him once and for all. 2005) (Ferguson, J., concurring) ("[M]unicipal police departments and bureaus are generally not considered `persons' within the meaning of section 1983"); Rodriguez v. Cnty. Id. As in the Prior Action, Plaintiff names Defendant Alfonso Martinez as a member of a conspiracy to wrongfully prosecute and convict Mr. Sussman. 2001). Their names are Carolyn Enders, Joshua Olsen, and 100 others. The Court has "supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy." Id. As to City Attorney Elliot and former Deputy City Attorney Scott, Plaintiff claims that they improperly prosecuted Mr. Sussman by "condoning perjury and false evidence" but does not allege further facts in support. 2008). She really beats up on the bad insurance companies. 110. Plaintiff does not further clarify the contours of this alleged conspiracy. "A federal court is without personal jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant has been served in accordance with Fed. 118 at 1. We know about ten companies registered at this address. ECF No. WebMs Sussman represented me in a truck auto accident. To establish a RICO injury, the plaintiff must show "harm to a specific business or property interest and if the alleged business or property interest is cognizable under state law." Professor, Department of Music and Dance. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Counts XI and XIII against the CBRN and the DMV are dismissed. A motion to dismiss should be granted if a plaintiff's complaint fails to contain "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Dr. Joshua Michael Sussman, PhD . Plaintiff does not specify the dates or circumstances of her confinement but appears to suggest that she was wrongfully confined to the psychiatric unit without her consent. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the Judicial Defendants, the Prosecutorial Defendants, the DMV and the CBRN are immune from suit, and the claims against them are dismissed. United States District Court, S.D. of Contra Costa, 2013 WL 5946112 at *3 (N.D. Cal. Plaintiff's Counts I and V appear to allege that Defendants conspired to and did in fact harm Plaintiff and Mr. Sussman by prosecuting and convicting Mr. Sussman, and ultimately causing his death. Because all the elements for res judicata are met, Plaintiff's Count I and Count V are dismissed as to the aforementioned Defendants. They put him in 3 different rehab facilities, after the completion of the court-ordered drug rehab they recommended that he return home. See Brazil v. U.S. Dep't of Navy,66 F.3d 193, 199 (9th Cir. This was a major conflict as he dismissed the case 6 months later for his friends and endorsers without any evidence allowed to be presented by the plaintiff at all, Nancy Sussman, and the estate of Michael Sussman. Any content provided by our bloggers or authors are of their opinion, and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything. As we speak (ca. The state of California presented Nancy Sussman with a law license in 1983 after she graduated from the University of Southern California (USC) School of Law. With the dismissals set forth above, the only remaining claims are state law claims for suspected murder (Count VI); false imprisonment (Count IX); violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count X); false arrest (Count XI); defamation (Count XIII); and interference with prospective economic advantages (Count XIV). Jan. 12, 2021) (collecting cases). 1986). Co., 790 F.2d 769, 772 (9th Cir. Cal. These are some of the names: World Automotive Financial Services,inc and Lavi International Corporation,. THEY VIOLATE EMTALA. Incognolio will be released by Janx Even if the Court were to find that supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims once existed under 28 U.S.C. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS JINSOOK OHTA, at 23; California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 3(D)(2). A pro se plaintiff's complaint must be construed liberally to determine whether a claim has been stated. Plaintiff further appears to claim that ADA Patrick participated in this wrong by falsely representing to the state court in the same criminal action that Plaintiff had threatened Alfonso Martinez. 2002). at 30-33. WebHenry Sussman may also have lived outside of San Diego, such as El Cajon and La Mesa. During Plaintiff's first arrest on August 17, 2019, the SDPD and individually named Officer Tharp allegedly "performed an illegal search of Sussman glove compartment and during that search placed a knife in the glove compartment." | BillionGraves. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. SUMMER STEPHAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY Plaintiff, who used to be an attorney, also appears to contend that Judge Pollack retaliated against her when he reported her conduct to the State Bar of California. Id. at 23. Moreover, Congress has not specifically allowed suits against states or their agencies under 1983. 110 at 2. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice.